top of page
  • Writer's pictureBruce Lamb


Updated: Mar 10, 2023

A few linked events, analogies and pearls of wisdom unleashed. Work In Progress.

Quick fire Q&A


  1. How would you find a needle in a haystack?

  2. How would you identify who placed a cut throat razor in Rangys Bag in a locked court room during adjournment.

  3. Why would anyone rapidly role out 5G with rising costs and energy prices and the current drain is maxed out at 30 Amps per phase. Its not a comm's system but a defence energy weapon. DEW.

  4. We now have the clear evidence that Russia are taking out the Cabal in Ukraine

  5. We now have the clear evidence that Westminster is effectively the UK Cabal

  6. We now have so much evidence that the jab was a Bio Weapon attack on the UK public and the rest of the world in order to depopulate. UK to 15 Million from 66 Million? Why wasnt it stopped? Who had the final say? Do No Harm.

  7. The Cabal are beginning to turn on one another and throw themselves under the bus - Matt Hancock - The modern day - Dr Mengele.. I presume. Who will be next. The answer wont be revealed by WDTK? So WDTK are NFU?


  1. Burn it down and get a big magnet or metal detector on the job. After the flames died down.

2. In real time set the ball in motion report to an independent Chief Constable that has previous knowledge of the case and your local MP. Plus witnesses youd trust with your life. Stephen Watson GMP CC.

Download PDF • 1.03MB

These guys were on site to protect and serve. But Who Are They Protecting & Why?

Guys get your boss to Contact Stephen Watson to get Barrie Trower's Tetra Radio Report..

1st March 2023.

3. If you want to cull the masses get third parties to do it (Economic Hitmen) or place a supposed comm's system in ATTACK MODE. Your local Council act as a front. They are bought and paid for by the WEF.

Flame throwers - Daleks - Energy Weapons - 5G

Tulsi Gabbard made her statement based on testimony from the Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs in Eurasia, Victoria Nuland.

Victoria Nuland admitted during testimony before a US Senate committee the existence of biological research labs in Ukraine.

Less than 24 hours later, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said that reports of biolabs in Ukraine were fake news propagated by Russia.

The Democrat-fake news-media complex then attacked anyone who brought up the biolabs in Ukraine.

Mitt Romney lashed out at Tulsi Gabbard, saying, “Tulsi Gabbard is parroting false Russian propaganda. Her treasonous lies may well cost lives.”

Then this happened– Russia released alleged captured documents from Ukraine exposing evidence of US Military Biolabs in Ukraine.

Russia made the accusations in front of the United Nations General Assembly.

He who asks the questions controls the conversation.

Unless the question is too difficult to answer and exposes those questioned for committing TREASON!!

So an FOIR went into Who Do They Know regarding the Attendance at Zelenskys UK Deep State Show in Westminster Hall.

Within 24 Hours it was deemed vexatious and removed from public view.

We The People have a right to know those in Westminster that are committing TREASON.

They would have been in the Great Hall applauding the Cabals nominated Ukranian PUPPET.. a Mr V Zelensky. Filmed. Security Checked etc.

We will have to make a few assumptions as we know not all are that bad given Chope and Bridgen are speaking out.. MP's Kane & Brady are F*cK3D!!

6. Work In Progress.

Who ghost wrote Matt Hancock’s diaries, has handed over a cache of WhatsApp messages from Hancock’s phone to the Telegraph. Oakeshott was given the messages by Hancock as an aide-mémoire and she has now passed them on. They appear to be pretty sensational, revealing that the then Health Secretary ignored Sir Chris Whitty’s advice about testing people in the community before admitting them to care homes, among other things. The Telegraph has the most sensational revelations on its website. Best of them at the foot of this page.

In Summary The Rangy Case.

It would appear the Judiciary - Perriman and Local Council have been working together to pervert the course of justice - Masonic - Common Purpose or DVD G02?

Then place a menacing blade in Rangys bag - Investigation Required..

Perverting the course of justice is an offence committed when a person prevents justice from being served on themselves or on another party. In England and Wales it is a common law offence, carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. Statutory versions of the offence exist in Australia, Canada, Ireland, and New Zealand. The Scottish equivalent is defeating the ends of justice,[1] while the South African counterpart is defeating or obstructing the course of justice.[2] A similar concept, obstruction of justice, exists in United States law.

England and Wales[edit]

Doing an act tending and intending to pervert the course of public justice[3] is an offence under the common law of England and Wales.

Perverting the course of justice can be any of three acts:

  • Fabricating or disposing of evidence

  • Intimidating or threatening a witness or juror

  • Intimidating or threatening a judge

Also criminal are:

  1. conspiring with another to pervert the course of justice, and

  2. intending to pervert the course of justice

This offence, and the subject matter of the related forms of criminal conspiracy, have been referred to as:

  • Perverting the course of justice

  • Interfering with the administration of justice

  • Obstructing the administration of justice

  • Obstructing the course of justice

  • Defeating the due course of justice

  • Defeating the ends of justice

  • Effecting a public mischief[4]

This proliferation of alternative names has been described as "somewhat confusing".[5]

This offence is also sometimes referred to as "attempting to pervert the course of justice". This is potentially misleading. An attempt to pervert the course of justice is a substantive common law offence and not an inchoate offence. It is not a form of the offence of attempt, and it would be erroneous to charge it as being contrary to section 1(1) of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981.[6]

Download PDF • 3.13MB

97 views0 comments


bottom of page